SBADecoded
Home / Research / 504 vs 7(a) default rates

Original research · from the federal loan record

504 defaults less than 7(a) — but almost entirely because its loans are bigger

Short answer. Among seasoned SBA loans, 5.7% of 7(a) loans and 5.0% of 504 loans charged off within seven years. Most of that gap is a loan-size effect, not the program — at the same loan size 504 is not clearly safer, and in the $350k–$2M range it defaults slightly more.

You will read everywhere that SBA 504 loans default at less than half the 7(a) rate. That is true only if you weight by dollars. Counted loan by loan, 504 defaults at 5.0% and 7(a) at 5.7% — a slim edge. And it is a mix effect: 7(a) writes a huge volume of small loans, which fail most. Line the two up at the same loan size and the story flips — in the $350k–$2M range where most 504 deals live, 504 actually defaults more.

504, by loan count
5.0%
7,368 of 146,851 seasoned
7(a), by loan count
5.7%
24,761 of 433,292
Gap, by loan
1.1×
not 2.5×
By dollars
0.84% vs 2.11%
the “half the rate” figure

The gap almost disappears when you count loans

Dollar-weighting — charged-off dollars over approved dollars — flatters whichever program writes bigger loans, because big loans default less often. 504 loans are big (a median $708,000 second, on top of an $880,000 bank first mortgage). So by dollars, 504’s losses look tiny: 0.84% against 2.11%. Count each loan once instead, and the picture is ordinary: 5.0% against 5.7%. Same federal file, same seven-year window — a completely different headline.

At the same loan size, 504 is not the safer bet

7-year default, counted by loan
Loan size5047(a)Who is safer
Under $150k4.2%7.1%504 safer
$150k–$350k4.4%5.2%504 safer
$350k–$500k5.1%4.0%504 worse
$500k–$1M5.4%3.0%504 worse
$1M–$2M8.0%2.4%504 worse
Over $2M1.8%1.9%504 safer
Under $150k — 504 4.2% vs 7(a) 7.1%
504 safer
$150k–$350k — 504 4.4% vs 7(a) 5.2%
504 safer
$350k–$500k — 504 5.1% vs 7(a) 4.0%
504 worse
$500k–$1M — 504 5.4% vs 7(a) 3.0%
504 worse
$1M–$2M — 504 8.0% vs 7(a) 2.4%
504 worse
Over $2M — 504 1.8% vs 7(a) 1.9%
504 safer

504 is genuinely safer only at the small end (under $350k). From $350k to $2M — where most 504 projects sit — 504 defaults more than 7(a), peaking at 8.0% versus 2.4% in the $1M–$2M band. 504’s overall edge comes almost entirely from 7(a) carrying an enormous tail of small, riskier loans, not from 504 borrowers being safer at a given size.

So why does everyone say 504 is safer?

Two things stack up. First, the widely-quoted figures are dollar-weighted, which rewards 504 for lending big. Second, even the loan-counted overall number (5.0% vs 5.7%) is a composition effect — a textbook case of Simpson’s paradox — because 58% of all 7(a) loans are under $150,000, the band that fails most. Neither means a $600,000 504 borrower is safer than a $600,000 7(a) borrower. The data says the opposite.

What 504’s real advantages are

None of this makes 504 a worse choice — it just isn’t a lower-default one. Its genuine advantages are structural: a fixed rate for up to 25 years, which removes the payment shock that pushes marginal variable-rate 7(a) borrowers over; a lower blended cost of capital on owner-occupied real estate; and a smaller down payment on big property deals. If you are buying a building, those are the reasons to run a 504 quote — not a default rate that, loan for loan, is no better. Compare the two on your numbers →

How we know

so you can check it

Source. SBA’s 7(a) and 504 FOIA releases of 2026-06-30, public domain. 146,851 seasoned 504 loans and 433,292 seasoned 7(a) loans — approved through fiscal 2018 and old enough to judge. “Default” is a charge-off within seven years of approval, counted by loan (one loan, one vote), which is why every rate equals a plain count you can check. Loans are grouped by fiscal year of approval so a fast-growing program cannot hide behind young loans.

One honest caveat. The size bands use the SBA-guaranteed amount — for 504 that is the CDC second only, so a 504 loan in a band sits on a larger total project than a 7(a) loan in the same band. We compare by SBA exposure because that is the number both programs report; read the bands as “SBA dollars at risk,” not total project size.

Data SBA 7(a) & 504 FOIA, 2026-06-30Seasoned loans, 7-yr eligible 580,143Method counted by loan, 7-year windowPublished 2026-07-31

If you are choosing between them

Choose 504 for owner-occupied property and heavy equipment, where its fixed long-term rate and lower down payment shine — not because it defaults less. Choose 7(a) for flexibility, speed and everything that isn’t real estate.

Compare on your numbers → How 504 works → Find a CDC →

Evidence & reproducibility

check our work
SourceSBA 7(a) & 504 FOIA files
Data released2026-06-30
Records analyzed580,143 seasoned loans (433,292 7(a) + 146,851 504)
DefinitionCharge-off within 7 years of approval, counted one loan at a time
ExclusionsLoans approved after FY2018; cancelled and unfunded approvals
Analysis updated2026-07-31
DownloadDefault by size band, 504 vs 7(a) (CSV)